You need to enable javascript for this functionality

 

Noise and Vibration

Quick Links: Noise Risks, Control of Noise, Vibration, Noise - a checklist and Think About.

Noise Risks

Exposure to excessive noise accelerates the normal hearing loss that occurs with age. It is also associated with the onset of tinnitus (continuous ringing in the ears), interference with workers' communication and concentration, and causes additional stress and fatigue. Instantaneous damage can result from exposure to extremely loud noise but most damage is cumulative, making it more difficult to notice until it is too late. The health effect of noise exposure depends primarily upon the noise level (measured in decibels or dB(A)) and the duration of exposure.

 

Typical levels

 
Typical levels of noise
decibels Types of Noise
0 Hearing threshold
60 Normal conversation
90 Typical process plant
100 Pneumatic drill/chain saws
120  Diesel engine room/riveting
140 Jet engine taking off (25m away)

 

Control of Noise

The Noise at Work Regulations 1989 apply to all work places and require employers to reduce the risk of hearing damage to the lowest level reasonably practicable. Options for reducing exposure to noise are described below in order of preference.

It is always best to control noise at source; the wearing of ear defenders is a last resort only.
  1. Reduce noise levels by design by changing operating procedures and processes, and buying low noise equipment (manufacturers and suppliers of high noise equipment are obliged to provide adequate information about their products).
  2. Implement methods of noise control such as silencers.
  3. Reduce the duration of employees' exposure to noise and provide hearing protection devices.
Where employees' daily exposure to noise levels is likely to be at or around 85 dB(A) the Regulations require employers to:
  1. Assess noise exposure and keep a record of the assessment.
  2. Provide information and training on the risks of exposure to noise and action to minimise the risks for employees.
  3. Make suitable ear protectors available to employees.
  4. Maintain and repair protective devices.
If workers need to raise their voices to speak to each other at a distance of two metres apart it is likely that some action is required. A competent person must carry out noise assessments. The competence of the person will depend on the complexity of the situation. You may wish to have a staff member trained to carry out the assessment or employ a consultant. The assessments must be reviewed when there has been a significant change in the workplace or if you think there is some other reason to suspect it is no longer valid e.g. staff begin to complain about the noise levels again. Daily noise exposure of employees depends on the level of noise and the length of time they are exposed to it.
 
Where daily noise exposure levels are at or above 90 dB(A) the Regulations place additional duties on employers. They must ensure that exposure to noise is reduced to the lowest level reasonably possible other than by the use of ear protectors.
 
They must also mark ear protection zones where noise levels are high and ensure ear protectors are provided and worn by all exposed workers.
 

Vibration

Vibration is often associated with noise but may be a problem in its own right. Resulting health effects from exposure to vibration can include headaches, sickness, spinal disorders and varicose veins where the vibration is acting on the whole body, and areas of bone decalcification, tissue hardening, osteoarthritis and vibration induced white finger where it is acting on the hand and arm only.

Vibration can be a particular problem in jobs such as drivers of heavy vehicles and operators of heavy machinery, road drillers, chain saw and pneumatic tool operators. Appropriate control measures will vary but may include design considerations for vehicles and equipment, control of exposure times, proper maintenance, protective clothing and alterations to working practices.
 

Noise - a checklist

  • Has the risk of hearing damage been reduced as far as reasonably practicable?
  • Has the noise exposure been properly assessed where necessary?
  • Have staff been provided with adequate information and training?
  • Is ear protection provided where necessary?
 

Think about.....

  • Is plant and machinery chosen with noise reduction in mind?
  • Can plant and machinery be fitted with noise reduction devices?
  • Can noisy areas be enclosed?
  • Has the number of people working in noisy areas been reduced as far as possible?
  • Has the length of time spent in noisy areas minimised?
  • Are ear protection zones used where appropriate?
  • Are noise reduction techniques used in preference to ear protection devices?
  • Has the noise exposure been assessed by a competent person?
  • Has the assessment been recorded?
  • Is the assessment repeated when changes in plant or procedures make it unreliable?
  • Have the risks of noise exposure been properly explained to all exposed staff?
  • Have staff been trained in the use of appropriate control measures?
  • Is adequate induction and refresher training provided?
  • Has protection suitable for noise been selected?
  • Has protection suitable for the staff who are to wear it been selected?
  • Is ear protection properly worn and supervised?
  • Is ear protection properly stored, maintained and repaired?
  • Are spare protective devices available for use at short notice where necessary?