2 responses from Ms Edwina Pointon (Individual)
1. Ms Edwina Pointon (Individual) : 8 Jul 2008 14:49:00
Please write your comment or explain your reasons for supporting or opposing this part of the Report. You may also wish to refer to the tests of soundess in the glossary of the Preferred Options document before making your comments.
LDF
I WAS UNDER THE IMPRESSION THAT THE DEADLINE FOR PUBLIC RESPONSES HAD BEEN EXTENDED AND I KNOW THAT MANY VILLAGERS OF CARTMEL ARE WAITING FOR MONDAY'S PUBLIC MEETING BEFORE RESPONDING. HOWEVER, I HAVE JUST LEARNED THAT THIS EXTENSION IS FOR PARISH COUNCILS ONLY. I HOPE THAT YOU ARE ABLE TO TAKE INTO ACCOUNT LATE RESPONSES, BUT IN THE MEANTIME I WISH TO SAY THAT THE GENERAL RESPONSE WHEN TALKING TO FELLOW VILLAGERS OF CARTMEL IS THAT OF THE 3 PROPOSED SITES FOR CARTMEL ORCHARD CLOSE CAN BE THE ONLY CONTENDER. HOWEVER, THERE IS CONCERN ABOUT ACCESS TO AYNSOME ROAD.
TO CONSIDER HAGGS LANE WOULD BE FOOLISH AS DRIVING IN THAT ROAD ON THAT BEND IS ALREADY LETHAL.
AGAIN, THE CLOGGER BECK PROPOSAL WOULD BE UNWORKABLE BECAUSE OF TRAFFIC ACCESS, BUT ALSO BECAUSE CARTMEL IS A VILLAGE OF GREEN SPACES, AS WAS AGREED AT THE"PLACE DETECTIVES" REVIEW WITH GRAHAM DARLINGTON.
I HOPE THIS E-MAIL COUNTS TOWARDS THE REVIEW AS I DON'T HAVE ACCESS TO THE OFFICIAL FORM.
2. Ms Edwina Pointon (Individual) : 8 Jul 2008 14:53:00
I REALISE THAT WE HAVE GONE PAST THE CLOSING DATE FOR COMMENTS, BUT WOULD JUST LIKE TO ADD THIS COMMENT TO EARLIER ONES AND HOPE IT IS CONSIDERED.
THERE IS A DEVELOPMENT SITE GOING BEGGING IN HAVERTHWAITE IRONWORKS WHERE THE BUILDING COMPANY ARE NO LONGER WORKING. COULD THIS NOT BE A SUITABLE SITE FOR THE PROPOSAL RATHER THAN TRY TO SQUEEZE AN EXTRA 80 HOUSES INTO THE LITTLE VILLAGE OF CARTMEL?