Response from Mr Mike Goyle (Individual)
1. Mr Mike Goyle (Individual) : 22 Jul 2008 12:13:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Please state as clearly as you can the exact part of the Report you are commenting on by quoting the page number (if known), paragraph number, option name or number, or the number of the map, figure or table.
Do you support, oppose or have an observation about this part of the Report?
Neither support nor oppose - just want to comment
Please write your comment or explain your reasons for supporting or opposing this part of the Report. You may also wish to refer to the tests of soundess in the glossary of the Preferred Options document before making your comments.
Although i appreciate the need for starter homes and employment oppotuniy, the suggested cross roads location for light industrial application would seem more suitable for housing. The industrial development could be located adjacent to exsisting such developments behind the ship inn.
However, the crossroads access would also provide a better housing access option than the suggetion of housing on Yan Lane field, as additonal housing here would require a new road system to be built, potentially damaging the heart of the village.