You are here Home | Planning | Local Development Framework | Consultation
  • Translate this site into German
  • Translate this site into Spanish
  • Translate this site into Italian
  • Translate this site into French
  • Translate this site into Japanese

Local Development Framework Consultation

Responses to Core Strategy - Preferred Options
2 responses from D Holdsworth (Individual)
1. D Holdsworth (Individual)   :   22 Jul 2008 09:48:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Please state as clearly as you can the exact part of the Report you are commenting on by quoting the page number (if known), paragraph number, option name or number, or the number of the map, figure or table.
Storth
Do you support, oppose or have an observation about this part of the Report?
Oppose
Please write your comment or explain your reasons for supporting or opposing this part of the Report. You may also wish to refer to the tests of soundess in the glossary of the Preferred Options document before making your comments.
1. Totally against indutrial development on Cockshott Lane.
a) not needed here - plenty of room still on Quarray lane.
b) Access via village on Cockshott Lane/ beetham is an idea generated by people who dont know the area.

2. against housing between playingfield and Storth road/ Dairy Lane. If housing need proved then use land between Kingfisher and TP yard. this area needs tidying up.
2. D Holdsworth (Individual)   :   22 Jul 2008 09:48:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Please state as clearly as you can the exact part of the Report you are commenting on by quoting the page number (if known), paragraph number, option name or number, or the number of the map, figure or table.
Storth
Do you support, oppose or have an observation about this part of the Report?
Oppose
Please write your comment or explain your reasons for supporting or opposing this part of the Report. You may also wish to refer to the tests of soundess in the glossary of the Preferred Options document before making your comments.
1. Totally against indutrial development on Cockshott Lane.
a) not needed here - plenty of room still on Quarray lane.
b) Access via village on Cockshott Lane/ beetham is an idea generated by people who dont know the area.

2. against housing between playingfield and Storth road/ Dairy Lane. If housing need proved then use land between Kingfisher and TP yard. this area needs tidying up.