3 responses from Ms Judith Burrow (Individual)
1. Ms Judith Burrow (Individual) : 3 Jul 2008 15:50:00
Please write your comment or explain your reasons for supporting or opposing this part of the Report. You may also wish to refer to the tests of soundess in the glossary of the Preferred Options document before making your comments.
I wish to register an objection to the proposed development of light industrial units at Storth. The area in question at Four Lane Ends is entirely unsuitable for such a development. There is ample land available on Quarry lane which is already an industrial area with appropriate access and services for such units.
2. Ms Judith Burrow (Individual) : 22 Jul 2008 10:14:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Please state as clearly as you can the exact part of the Report you are commenting on by quoting the page number (if known), paragraph number, option name or number, or the number of the map, figure or table.
Point 33 - Storth - proposed development of light industry site adjacent to Cockshott Lane.
Do you support, oppose or have an observation about this part of the Report?
Oppose
Please write your comment or explain your reasons for supporting or opposing this part of the Report. You may also wish to refer to the tests of soundess in the glossary of the Preferred Options document before making your comments.
Me and my husband currently have grazing rights on the land identified in point 33. Apart form the effect on our farming business form the loss of the land, i need to highlight the serious access problems. The lanes approaching this site are narrow and hazardous at the best of times without any additonal traffic. There is a quantity of industrial land already available in Quarray Lane and Sandside Road with much better access. There is no public transport near to this proposed site and any development would be highly visable to exisiting homes on Paddock Way.
3. Ms Judith Burrow (Individual) : 22 Jul 2008 10:18:00
A typed or handwritten document was submitted. This has been scanned and can be downloaded below:
Please state as clearly as you can the exact part of the Report you are commenting on by quoting the page number (if known), paragraph number, option name or number, or the number of the map, figure or table.
Point 33 - Storth Site - proposed development of light inductrial site adjacent to Cockshott Lane.
Do you support, oppose or have an observation about this part of the Report?
Oppose
Please write your comment or explain your reasons for supporting or opposing this part of the Report. You may also wish to refer to the tests of soundess in the glossary of the Preferred Options document before making your comments.
We are the current occupiers of the two fields identified.. Industrial development would reduce our income and abilty to run our farm business. We had no knowledge of development on this land. The access is toatlly unsuitable as are the roads either through Storth Viallge or over Cockshott from Beetham