You are here Home | Planning | Local Development Framework | Consultation
  • Translate this site into German
  • Translate this site into Spanish
  • Translate this site into Italian
  • Translate this site into French
  • Translate this site into Japanese

Local Development Framework Consultation

Responses to Core Strategy - Preferred Options
2 responses from Mr. Richard Evans (Individual)
1. Mr. Richard Evans (Individual)   :   4 Jun 2008 22:30:00
To which part of the Report does your representation relate? Paragraph or Section
4.80 - 4.88 PO16 - Remaining Local Service Centres South and East - Introduction
Please state as clearly as you can the exact part of the Report you are commenting on by quoting the page number (if known), paragraph number, option name or number, or the number of the map, figure or table.
The preferred directions of growth for new employment development at Burton in Kendal as shown on the Local Service Centre Area Strategy Maps.
Do you support, oppose or have an observation about this part of the Report?
Oppose
Please write your comment or explain your reasons for supporting or opposing this part of the Report. You may also wish to refer to the tests of soundess in the glossary of the Preferred Options document before making your comments.
The access roads to this site are not suitable for additional traffic. Neddy Hill and Tanpits Lane are residential roads, both are traditional village streets, they are narrow, with no footways or verges and have right angle bends and restricted forward visibility. We walk our children to school and the shops along these roads and any increase in traffic would be unacceptable in terms of pedestrian and traffic safety. The alternative route to the A 6 along Moss lane is a single track road with occasional passing bays and a less than 3metre height limit under the canal bridge.

I do not know what the drainage implications would be of developing this land but there are already problems with the sewers at Neddy Hill after heavy rain and there have been problems with the rising main from St James's Drive.
What change(s) would you suggest for this part of the Report?
Deletion of this proposed employment site to the west of Burton in Kendal.
Please use this space if you wish to set out a new option for consideration.
It is not clear how much consideration has been given to the relationship of the village to employment developments at Clawthorpe, Dalton Hall, Moss End and in Carnforth.
Please indicate if you wish to be notified when the Core Strategy has been:
Submitted to the Secretary of State for independent examination
2. Mr. Richard Evans (Individual)   :   4 Jun 2008 22:37:00
To which part of the Report does your representation relate? Paragraph or Section
Key Diagrams - Remaining Local Service Centres (South & East)
Please state as clearly as you can the exact part of the Report you are commenting on by quoting the page number (if known), paragraph number, option name or number, or the number of the map, figure or table.
The Key diagram for Burton in Kendal and its preferred option for employment land development on the west side of the village.
Do you support, oppose or have an observation about this part of the Report?
Oppose
Please write your comment or explain your reasons for supporting or opposing this part of the Report. You may also wish to refer to the tests of soundess in the glossary of the Preferred Options document before making your comments.
Pedestrian and road safety as detailed in my representation for Policy PO16.
What change(s) would you suggest for this part of the Report?
Deletion of this preferred option.
Please use this space if you wish to set out a new option for consideration.
Consideration of existing employment land developments as detailed for PO16.
Please indicate if you wish to be notified when the Core Strategy has been:
Submitted to the Secretary of State for independent examination