Response from Mr Neil Webster (Individual)
1. Mr Neil Webster (Individual) : 30 May 2008 12:46:00
To which part of the Report does your representation relate?
Paragraph or Section
4.63 - 4.64 PO14 - Milnthorpe Functional Area 2025 - Introduction
Please state as clearly as you can the exact part of the Report you are commenting on by quoting the page number (if known), paragraph number, option name or number, or the number of the map, figure or table.
4.63 I object to Heversham being linked with Milnthorpe. Heversham is a small village with its own Primary school, Church and pub. The development requirements of the village are not of the scale being proposed
4.64 This para states that Heversham has a secondary school that serves Milnthorpe, This is not factually correct. The old Heversham Grammar school is not used as a teaching site, as this is all done in Milnthorpe
Do you support, oppose or have an observation about this part of the Report?
Please write your comment or explain your reasons for supporting or opposing this part of the Report. You may also wish to refer to the tests of soundess in the glossary of the Preferred Options document before making your comments.
4.64 includes an error as stated above
What change(s) would you suggest for this part of the Report?
Heversham should not be included with Milnthorpe, it should be treated as a small village and any development should be proportionate, ie not on the scale being proposed
Please indicate if you wish to be notified when the Core Strategy has been:
Adopted by the District Council
Submitted to the Secretary of State for independent examination