3 responses from Mrs Caroline Clutterbuck (Individual)
1. Mrs Caroline Clutterbuck (Individual) : 28 May 2008 20:44:00
To which part of the Report does your representation relate?
Paragraph or Section
The Preferred Option - PO12 - Ulverston Functional Area 2025
Please state as clearly as you can the exact part of the Report you are commenting on by quoting the page number (if known), paragraph number, option name or number, or the number of the map, figure or table.
OPTION 2 - SUPERMARKET
p141
Do you support, oppose or have an observation about this part of the Report?
Oppose
Please write your comment or explain your reasons for supporting or opposing this part of the Report. You may also wish to refer to the tests of soundess in the glossary of the Preferred Options document before making your comments.
OPTION 2 - SUPERMARKET
A larger supermarket is not required in town as we have a good one in Booths out of town, and sufficient in town Co-op. If a large chain is put in town it will draw people away from supporting the local shops and take away the atmosphere of the market town.
2. Mrs Caroline Clutterbuck (Individual) : 28 May 2008 20:46:00
To which part of the Report does your representation relate?
Paragraph or Section
The Preferred Option - PO12 - Ulverston Functional Area 2025
Please state as clearly as you can the exact part of the Report you are commenting on by quoting the page number (if known), paragraph number, option name or number, or the number of the map, figure or table.
OPTION 3 ALTERNATIVE DIRECTIONS OF GROWTH
P142&3
Do you support, oppose or have an observation about this part of the Report?
Support partly
Please write your comment or explain your reasons for supporting or opposing this part of the Report. You may also wish to refer to the tests of soundess in the glossary of the Preferred Options document before making your comments.
OPTION 3 ALTERNATIVE DIRECTIONS
5. NORTH WEST SWARTHMOOR & 9. SOUTH
This is a good direction for development as they have direct access to the A590 which would cope better with the traffic increase and not load it onto small roads
3. Mrs Caroline Clutterbuck (Individual) : 4 Jul 2008 09:46:00
The Preferred Option - PO12 - Ulverston Functional Area 2025
TABLE 14 1 SOUTH ULVERSTON
OPPOSE
I OPPOSE THESE PROPOSALS FOR SEVERAL REASONS:
- THIS DEVELOPMENT WOULD BECOME TOO CLOSE TO BIRKRIGG COMMON WHICH IS A POPULAR LOCATION ALREADY AND I WONDER COULD IT BE HARMED ENVIROMENTALLY BY SUCH A DEVELOPMENT, ESP. PUTTING MORE PRESSURE ON IT
- I CURRENTLY HAVE A VIEW OF GREEN FIELDS OUT OF MY HOUSE, THIS IS LIKELY TO BE REPLACED BY HOUSING WHICH I AM NOT HAPPY ABOUT ESPECIALLY AS I DOUBT THERE IS A COMPENSATION SCHEME FOR A REDUCTION IN VALUE OF THE HOUSE FOR THIS AND THE FACT MORE LOW COST HOUSING IS EXPECTED TO BE BUILT AND WOULD ALSO REDUCE THE VALUE IN IT'S SELF.
- THERE IS NO MAJOR ROADS TO SUPPORT THE INCREASE IN TRAFFIC LOAD TO THIS PLANNED HOUSING AREA PUTTING A LOT OF PRESSURE ON EXISTING SMALL ROADS.